How to Get Away With Mu Rder Review
How to Go Away with Legal Inaccuracy
I saw at least three other reviews of this Telly show that put information technology at a half dozen/10 for the sole reason that it is an inaccurate portrayal of lawyers. Aye, and...? Does that take away from the brilliant plot and acting? I don't think anything in flick or telly is an accurate portrayal of annihilation. If someone were to rewrite this exciting show into an "authentic portrayal" of police force, then it would just be a evidence about Viola Davis filling out paper work and occasionally showing upwardly in court. And some of these reviewers proceed to say that it is a shame that people believe that is how the court of constabulary is in real life. My advice to them is to become to the IMDb folio of the Avengers and write a review that says, "information technology's a shame that every unmarried person who watches this moving picture now believes superheroes actually be," because manifestly no one who is a consumer of media entertainment has the mutual sense to know that lawyers do non, in reality, become around killing and bribing anybody.
No one watches a show similar How to Get Away with Murder for a lesson in law, they watch it for the interesting characters and fascinating plot. I had to write this review to correct all of the mistaken reviews that gave this show anything less than a 7, because the overall rating of this show was dismaying to me. And to learn it is for such a irrelevant reason!
693 out of 776 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Viola Davis
For me, its bones virtue remains to find Viola Davis. and to admire her impecable operation. to see the labyrinth of a murder and the pressure and a story without real heroes. her force to define the atomic number 82 graphic symbol is the best motif to meet the serie.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vivid from start to cease!
I'm heartbroken this is over but it ended so perfectly, something a majority of series completely neglect to do! I've never rated anything a straight up 10 earlier but, this gets information technology! Each season is gripping, information technology is then cleverly done and volition have you lot on the border of your seat gagging for the next installment. The writing, the interim, the flash backs (and forward) are all on point here. Hats off to Viola Davis, a truly crawly pb! How To Get Away With Murder doesnt "drag on" or "get boring" part mode through. Some other thing and so many other series neglect to reach. This is a bright picket and I highly recommend. Thank you and so much for this total gem!
61 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Reasonably ok...
Glorified soap opera...Personally,i would like to see more in depth report of interesting criminal cases ,instead of generally family,dear,gay drama...however ,ok time killer...
7 out of vii found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
FINALLY A Bear witness THAT GAVE PROPER CLOSURE
A bear witness that ended properly in a long fourth dimension even though their makeup was terrible 😂.simply loved it and will always leave a impact on me MUST Spotter!.
99 out of 117 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Among Network TV's best dramas
I have no idea why it has taken me this long to write a review for this testify since I have loved it since solar day i. Meanwhile, How to Get Abroad With Murder has become my favorite bear witness on television, and here'south why: Even in a gold age of television, network TV has been lacking original content in the last few years. There are too many procedural dramas and too many superhero shows, so therefore I am glad to take a show like HTGAWM. Yes, information technology is partly a legal drama, but it is definitely so much more than than than. IMO information technology is primarily a mystery and a thriller at the same fourth dimension because every flavor starts with an intriguing flash-forward, showing us a very dramatic event that takes place in their mid-flavour finale. However, when nearly shows have flash-forrard they simply feature one in the premiere and practically have no build-upward to it, HTGAWM does the opposite, it features a wink-forward in every one of the first 8 episodes of a flavor and plays with our mind. By the time you have watched the mid-season finale itself, your mind will be blown. Just why am I telling you this? Considering I am trying to underline that this evidence has the most vivid and shocking twists you could even imagine, and they accept near 100 of those. They are executed with such luminescence and complexity that you will never get bored or annoyed by them. What is probably fifty-fifty improve than the brilliant twists, all the same, is the masterful interim. Viola Davis nails every unmarried scene she is, she portrays this securely flawed character beautifully with so much depth. I cannot praise her plenty, she deserves every single award that exists. That is not to say that the supporting cast is any less mesmerizing, they all bring their A-game consistently. They all deserve recognition. And ane last thing: character development!!!! So so bright! The characters that you encounter in the airplane pilot change a lot as time passes and they all become very 3-dimensional! Just go ahead and watch this show. I could say so much more, but only become enjoy the fun and crazy ride. You won't regret it, I hope!
120 out of 152 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
twisty storytelling wears out over time
Annalise Keating (Viola Davis) is a sought-later on law professor and a famous hard-charging defense attorney willing to push the envelope. She selects her students Wes Gibbins, Connor Walsh, Michaela Pratt, Asher Millstone, and Laurel Castillo equally her interns to work on her cases. There is Annalise's hubby Sam and her undercover matter with constabulary detective Nate Lahey. There are her associates Frank Delfino and Bonnie Winterbottom. The kickoff season centered on the murder of student Lila Stangard and Rebecca Sutter who is the main suspect.
This is Shondaland. The flashforward structure of the offset season is challenging just kept the bear witness different and interesting. There is cipher better than Viola Davis. She shines but she besides overpowers the younger cast. The biggest overshadowed trouble is Alfred Enoch who is most known for a minor Harry Potter role. He'due south non solitary in that problem. It doesn't help that the storytelling is not-stop twists and turns. The characters never become the stability needed to build chemistry. The 2nd flavour centers on a dissimilar instance and by the third season, I accept to surrender. All the effort is used to keep upwards with the twisty stories. Simply Viola Davis is able to break through. Information technology's just really tough to remember the situations for each character over the years.
23 out of 32 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ridiculous and gay and pretty awesome
If you want to lookout man yet another procedural about lawyers that's realistic or even researched in any way this is not the show for y'all. Notwithstanding if you want an over the height, melodramatic, sexy, unpredictable show that'll go along you guessing and laughing and freaking out with every bewilderment, then watch this.
Viola Davis is amazing (unsurprisingly) and Analise is one of the most interesting main characters on TV right now.
This show had one of the all-time pilots I've seen in a while and the flavour 2 premiere was i of the best episodes of television I've seen all yr (and I watch A LOT of Television set).
In summary, How To Get Away With Murder is kinda dumb, kinda funny, actually engaging and enthralling and constantly surprising.
184 out of 253 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wow this show keeps getting meliorate season after season!
I enjoyed this show from the showtime of the season and rated it 8/10.
So as the episodes and seasons progressed, I got annoyed with the abiding dorsum and along timelines - of which I felt were confusing and unnecessary. Thus I dropped my score down to a seven.
Well, now into season 4, these timeline flashbacks and flash frontwards are making sense and getting better.
The tension of this show is intense and Viola Davis has found her role - nails information technology flavor after season. I want her character to be my friend and mentor lol.
Score is now upwardly to a 9.v rounded up to a x/x.
28 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I don't usually use the term guilty pleasure...
This is definitely a fourth dimension to employ it. Dissimilar other ABC shows I used to watch similar Desperate Housewives, I never heard a good word about HTGAWM. When Drastic Housewives first appeared there were plaudits and comparisons with Six Anxiety Under and Sexual activity & The City. Much like DH, this show centres on a mystery (who killed Lila Stangart and how are the main characters going to get abroad with murder?). Add to that some of the horniest students and professionals I've seen on television set since Queer as Folk, you've got a dandy mix of intrigue, hysteria and mystery. It doesn't pretend to be a good testify. It'southward overblown, information technology'due south riddled with over-acting, the plot is paper thin and the court scenes are like cheap episodes of "The Adept Wife." And it works in the shows favour. It'south so expert because information technology never one time puts on the front of being a good television bear witness. It's trashy and dirty and Viola Davis is absolutely amazing. If you're needing to current of air downwardly after a hard day of actual work, tune in to How To Get Away With Murder and enjoy the petty dramas of an oversexed, over-thinking, overdressed bandage. The jury is out - How To Get Away With Murder is guilty! Guilty of beingness pleasurable.
42 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Messy and addictive
This is a story well-nigh a police professor and her inner circle of students, collegues, lovers and friends who each season notice themselves involved in a murder and utilise their legal knowledge to cover upward their crimes.
Sounds distasteful? It very much is. It's messy, ugly, upsetting - and totally bright!
The entire cast is astounding. Viola Davis in particular brings magic to every scene she'south in, and it's incommunicable to imagine anyone else playing Professor Annalise Keating.
While the series pushes the limits for how many murders we're supposed to accept that our little group of anti-heroes gets involved in, the story is a dramatic rollercoaster that I couldn't get enough of. I binged every flavour. This series feels so fresh that you can't really compare information technology to any other show.
22 out of 33 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Loved Information technology, Then Hated Information technology, At present I Love To Hate It: A Lawyer'southward Tale
At the fourth dimension of writing, I have seen all of season one and the start episode of season 2.
I've seen other reviews on here that talk about how impossible it is to spotter this show if you accept any legal knowledge, and I would just similar to add my two cents to this topic. I sympathize. I'm a lawyer, and have worked in criminal defence force (in one case upon a time), and I, besides, by and large take a really hard time watching any legal dramas whatsoever. Television takes egregious liberties with the justice system, and shows that portray the practise of law are difficult to watch when they are wildly inaccurate, and it is frustrating to witness protagonists exercise things that you know are illegal or unethical. Every bit abrasive as this is, the tendency is understandable—even criminal law is only so compelling in real life. The assumption is that most viewers practice not take legal training, and that nobody—lawyers included—will watch a show where competent, ethical practitioners stay at the office late looking up cases on Quicklaw, fiddling with binding machines, and trying non to smudge pad thai sauce on their prelim transcripts.
This bear witness, however, is and so ridiculous that information technology actually rose to the level of suspension of disbelief required for me, at to the lowest degree, to still savour information technology. It is basically a soap opera. Trying to subject field it to human logic is a pointless exercise that will inevitably leave you discombobulated, shouting at the heaven virtually injustice or whatever people practice one time they've discovered their whole life is a prevarication.
For instance, I would be difficult pressed to conceive of a more profound disharmonize of interest than that contained in the flavour one episode 10 court scene if someone bet me $100 and a instance of beer (I won't describe information technology in the interests of no spoilers--the blame-shifting thing). And that is just the tip of the iceberg. Every other matter that every character does in this show would become you lot summarily disbarred, fired, or charged with something.
At the finish of the twenty-four hour period however, that is not the indicate. This evidence seems to know exactly how over-the-elevation it is. Simply rather than trying to scale dorsum the insanity in the name of realism, it revels in knocking information technology right into twelfth gear. Left and correct, people are lying to each other or the court, sleeping around and committing felonies—sometimes at the same fourth dimension—considering why not? The degree of accuracy is so low that the mercury drops out the bottom of the thermometer and creates a rift in the space-fourth dimension continuum. It fails so hard it wins. Information technology is the Hearts equivalent of shooting the moon.
So get some popcorn and get comfy. Try to resist the analytical voice in your head that keeps screaming "No!" and just let information technology wash over yous. Everything will exist fine.
116 out of 172 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fun!
I just binge watched season 1 and I loved information technology. Starting time off I desire to say that at that place are a bunch of complaining critics on hither that I remember are missing the indicate of the show. How to get away with murder. It'southward not a evidence that's going to depict total reality. It's a fun to watch exaggerated clever show (but in that location's a bit of truth behind as of this exaggeration). Peradventure the critics that rate the bear witness so harshly should really sentinel information technology with a grain of salt. Then many are saying that it'due south unrealistic. The law schools are not at all like this. Law isn't practiced like this. Oh abound upward. The crazy twisting corrupted lying adulterous goings-on are exaggerated and accelerated to make information technology more fun to watch. This is a fun bear witness and I am nigh certainly looking forward to flavor two. At present I will agree that there are some gratuitous sex scenes that just really aren't necessary. The writers really don't have to spell it out for u.s.a.. We get it. Maybe they will ease upwardly on that kind of stuff in season two. Good show and I recommend it to people who are open-minded to the fact that TV doesn't always have to be based on true accented reality. Information technology's supposed to be entertaining. And this bear witness is definitely entertaining.
47 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good start
This starts out well but so all the characters merely get annoying because they are all deviant in beliefs. There is no balance.
half dozen out of viii found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Slow at the start only Awesome all- in- all
The most interracial show ever made, seems to be the main theme of the serial. But the plot takes the cherry. The twists through out the story is only hypnotizing. Even though it is irksome at the get-go, the end pays information technology off with involvement.It seems to have been fabricated with a message of women, gay and other empowerment and is not at all subtle near it. It has Gay sex in every episode..that girls might love. But all these negative points are well outweighed past the the story-line plus acting. Majorly the actor in the lead role "Anna Keating". Her work is impeccable. I tin can't think the last fourth dimension I failed to place the killer beforehand. The director would amaze anybody with the brilliant work. "How to get abroad with murder" there could not be a better title than this.Then, watch information technology right now, acquit start few episodes with patience, then drown in its magic. Great Prove!!
55 out of 100 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Getting Away With Murder
Warning: Spoilers
Having watched Shonda Rhime's Grey'southward Anatomy, I was kind of expecting a lot of drama with How to Go Away with Murder. However, having watched several episodes, I'm not liking the manner the legal system is existence portrayed nor am I enjoying the unnecessary scenes that act as a filler to the script.
Though I'one thousand fascinated by the bandage and what is actually happening, I think the storyline could move forth much faster than it's current state, and that can exist rectified by focusing on the quality of script and dialogue instead of attracting more shock-and-awe attending at every possible moment, especially with the overdose on sexual scenes and illegal activities of Keating's law students.
It'southward extremely far-fetched to have the legal organisation portrayed as such, and a classroom being taught by a lawyer/professor who teaches her students how to be "skillful" lawyers. It'south ridiculous, and the combined talents of all the slap-up actors and actresses on this show are not enough to relieve the series if it continues on like this.
The nearly intriguing part of the storyline is the murder plot, which you tin merely meet snippets of in each episode. That's what's keeping me going. But overall, it's non the greatest testify and I highly uncertainty I will keep watching subsequently nosotros all effigy out the upshot of the murder plot.
If you're into a whole bunch of pointless, far-fetched drama and filler sex scenes that push your boundaries, so How to Become Away with Murder might tickle your fancy. If not, and so either stay tuned to see whodunit or give upwards watching as the show'due south not going to change.
110 out of 219 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sentry it for the twists not the reality
This show is like sneaking down at dark to consume a quart of Ben and Jerry's ice foam From the freezer. Information technology is wonderful, but has no actual value...you lot savour it, merely realize it doesn't exercise you any good. Every bit long every bit you take it for what it is worth, a sort of soft porn everyone screws everyone and all the characters somehow are related and guilty of something as the evidence goes on you will enjoy information technology.
Like that ice cream, it is empty calories. Remember you are NOT eating a gourmet meal, so don't expect one. Sit back, relax and enjoy and try to effigy out what twist and devious plot turn is coming next. Exercise Not try to reference whatsoever sort of legal reality, because you will be very disappointed...lot of liberty taken with actual laws.
Most of the acting is very well washed and I, for one, savour listen candy.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Trash
Warning: Spoilers
Review of season one.
In that location's a mutual proverb that if yous don't like it then don't watch. Basically a style to categorize critics away as haters. It would be possible to simply stop watching a series that was wholly, completely repulsive, but How To Go Abroad With Murder, like many such examples, carries some sparks of brilliance that keeps you hanging on.
I wanted to quit many times. The four main characters have zippo likable about them. I was hoping that that would be the point. That this would be the evidence about amoral people eventually digging their own grave. Sadly what we got was this mess.
And of form no review of How To Get Away With Murder can go on without mentioning the unnecessary gratuitous sex scenes that did aught but repulse me.
The only real spark of this evidence was Annalise. Viola Davis creates an amazing graphic symbol that is a great combination of strength and weakness that makes her conceivable. Simply, sadly, I couldn't recommend this show fifty-fifty for her.
And and so of grade there is the mystery. Till the cease I was hoping this series would take a smart catastrophe, something to blow you away. But all we got was a B course ending of "y'all will never gauge it was this character fifty-fifty though it makes no sense and feels like they made information technology upwards at the final minute".
In short I hold this serial as trash and I have no want to scout the second season.
84 out of 173 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the best shows I've ever watched
I honestly can say that this is one of the absolute best Telly shows I've ever watched. I feel like they are my family unit! I'1000 going to be and so sad when it ends.
61 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another decent enough serial ruined by the crazy.
Forget the spam reviews, 10/10 is only the rating fans give information technology to feel good about loving this pretty shallow legal drama. It's everything we knew and sometimes loved almost Shonda Rhimes serial. Flavour 1 was a fresh concept, but each seasons got more ridiculous and extremely soap-ish, with all the family/relationship dramas, and over the tiptop twists and turns. With some characters backgrounds changing every flavour, to fit the « woke » agendas more. It even made re-watching the show, a real chore for me. Later that most perfect second season. Too unrealistic, forced and theatrical for me gustation. And PC, too PC for its own adept. With the usual amount of double standards and what non, some viewers eat for breakfast. The madness surrounding the main actress « talent » went to such extremes... She was proficient, but not THAT skillful. Simply things I really liked nearly this prove, was that sense of novelty, first flavour brought to the genre. Some of the cast members, and the music selection (very distinctive to the atmosphere of the series, and full of hidden gems). Other than that, it's decent plenty to exist watched (or hate watched, thank you to some regulars and main characters choices and reactions) Only not that unforgettable, or addictive afterwards a couple of seasons.
fourteen out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The One-act Hit of the Year!
The writers and producers of this show probably thought they were creating an edgy, glamorous and sexy, if somewhat fanciful, legal drama. They have in fact created the best unintentional comedy I've seen in a long fourth dimension. I've watched some preposterous twaddle on TV in my time, but this was then outstandingly, hilariously stupid that it deserves its own drinking game.
I guess it was - shall we say, "inspired"? - by that '70s classic "The Newspaper Hunt" ... hotshot law students vie to win the esteem of the brilliant merely cranky police force professor ... just now, instead of pudgy, white, jowly John Houseman, Professor Cranky-Pants is a feisty, ultra-glamorous African-American lady with Naomi Campbell makeup and a skin-tight red leather jerkin ...
This show has SO many things incorrect with it that information technology must surely become a cult one-act hit among the legal fraternity. For example ... Prof. Cranky-Pants is also a practising chaser who alternates, plainly 24-hour interval-by-day, lecturing in law *and* defending loftier-profile criminal cases .. 'cos, like, you would *totally* have time to do that ... and, naturally, she lectures publicly, in precise particular, on the actual cases she'll be defending THE NEXT Twenty-four hours ... and because she'due south and then brilliant and hateful, she pits her students against each other to come up with the best possible defence for the instance she'south running tomorrow - and she'll use theirs if its meliorate .. what? come on, I bet that really happens!
And of course, in this liberated and uncensored era, we encounter all the modernistic hi-jinks that glamorous yuppie students and their teachers get upwardly to in order to .. ahem ... "become ahead" in the constabulary game ... like the cute male pupil who turns out to be gay, who manages to get vital info about the case by going to the gay bar frequented past the gay nerds from the It Department of the visitor where the accused worked ... he chats upwardly the bookish (i.e. wears glasses) but cute gay Asian-American Information technology nerd, who of course looks shiftily at his anxiety equally he admits that he's been instructed by the firm's legal dep't not to discuss the case. It (almost) goes without proverb that Information technology Nerd'due south steely resolve melts instantly when Sexy Gay Law Student uses his cloak-and-dagger weapon - he turns his attentions away from him for a moment and makes eyes at some other guy ... seconds later, after the obligatory "Don't tell anyone I told you" disclaimer, they're ripping each other's shirts off and slamming onto the bed, while IT Nerd sings like a canary ...
... later on nosotros meet the equally sexy female pupil who "impresses" Prof. Cranky-Pants by telling her how she used false pretences to illegally obtain totally inadmissible bear witness almost a witness' medical status ... instant Credit, of class!
... after, in the obligatory "feet of clay" interlude, nosotros follow Model-cute African- American Underdog Student (actually played by an English language kid who was in Harry Potter) as he drops over to Prof. Cranky-Pants' (totally unlocked) office, late at night, to ask a sticky legal question - as you do ... but something's awry ... nosotros hear some grunting sounds - so of grade he barges into the inner office where - naturally - he stumbles onto Prof. Cranky-Pants giving a head-job to an enormous, heavily-muscled, shirtless black man ... what? I'yard sure that happens at Harvard Law School all the time!
We decided to press "stop" at the point where the students meet the defendant ... simply she doesn't come to the large, comfy, well-equipped lecture hall - oh no ... that would be likewise easy, and not "legal" enough. No, the Entire Class has to meet her in Prof. Cranky-Pants' sumptuous, wood-panelled, book-lined office, and they cram in there, in a not-at-all-stagey-and-awkward manner, lined upwards the staircase, and everything ... taking notes, on notepads - as y'all practice in 2014 - nodding sagely, or looking at each other quizzically and shaking their heads, while cute, tearful, blonde Ms Accused gives her sob-wracked account of the case.
I know TV is just a business concern, but it never ceases to amaze me how so many people are willing to be involved with such sloppily-conceived, platitude-infested, badly written, poorly acted CRAP, and how network execs seem incessantly willing to give huge amounts of money to continue producing crud similar this ... and information technology's doubly galling when 1 considers the many well-written, well-acted, well-produced and brilliantly original programming, like 'Firefly', 'The Fades' and 'Outcasts', that get cancelled after one series.
163 out of 327 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What can I say... it's almost a masterpiece
How To Become Away With Murder is not a show for everybody. Practise non watch information technology with preconceived ideas, do not watch it if yous are prude, do not watch it if yous await detailed and realistic portrayal of courts and sticking letter past letter of the alphabet to the police. And the list goes on...
Watch it for what information technology is and what standards information technology set. A fine piece of thrilling show with superb acting and chemistry, particularly the pb actress, who by now virtually every fan knows her name. A suspenseful puzzle full of intricacies going from the climax astern, until all clouds disperse and the blinding truth shows its devilish and mischievous face up.
Put your hands on this show, empty your listen, dim the room light, pump the speaker up and become yourself drowned in its world. You will come out shaky with your oral cavity dry out.
eleven out of nineteen found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dreadfully BAD and Absurdly Unrealistic
Warning: Spoilers
Absurb Pile of Cr--
This may be the near poorly written program of the 2014 Season. Information technology is so bad it will brand your teeth hurt.
I went to Law School. The actual experience is absolutely cipher like this turgid melodrama.
Viola Davis poses her way through every scene wallowing in every melodramatic moment later some other. Police Professors merely do not act like this. Davis lacks the personal authority to effectively play this office.
Scout this programs at present - information technology volition not be effectually by mid season.
96 out of 217 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pure Trash
Warning: Spoilers
It may be hard to believe, but in that location was a time in TV history where even married couples had to be shown sleeping in single beds. Now information technology seems simply nearly anything goes. Where are the censors? How does this trash get on the air? Sex activity scenes, oral sex, etc. The TV censors are letting more and more than of this crap be shown. And boy is this evidence disruptive. I like Viola Davis so gave this bear witness a attempt and I wish I hadn't. She plays a ruthless defense force attorney who teaches a class on how to be a great defense attorney. While this lawyer & professor (Annalise) is upset about her married man'southward supposedly infidelity, she was unfaithful herself. Nobody has any kind of morals on this show; not the lawyer, cop or students. Possible spoiler I missed the pilot episode then I'm a little confused about what is going on with her students. Did they impale someone and are trying to cover it upward? Did her hubby have an affair and so kill one of his students? No idea and I don't care as I will never watch this garbage again. If you have whatsoever kind of morals or sense of propriety, this is non the bear witness for you.
99 out of 213 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dissappointed
I started watching this prove as information technology was recommended highly and also had good online ratings. I Really enjoyed it at start but halfway through the season information technology started feeling slow. Things got convoluted & started to get unreal. I was REALLY dissappointed at the end of season 1, so I won't exist continuing to watch.
fifteen out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3205802/reviews
0 Response to "How to Get Away With Mu Rder Review"
Post a Comment